<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agents | Andrej Leban</title><link>https://andleb.netlify.app/tag/agents/</link><atom:link href="https://andleb.netlify.app/tag/agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Agents</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents</title><link>https://andleb.netlify.app/publication/causalds/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://andleb.netlify.app/publication/causalds/</guid><description>&lt;p>The paper introduces a benchmark &lt;em>generator&lt;/em> for causal reasoning in agentic data-science workflows: every benchmark instance is synthetically generated rather than curated. In it, we:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Generate fully synthetic &lt;em>scenes&lt;/em> pairing a sampled causal graph and structural causal model with tabular data and natural-language story;&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Add an optional &lt;em>observation layer&lt;/em> that varies the data-analysis difficulty without changing the causal side;&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Derive tasks spanning all three rungs of Pearl&amp;rsquo;s hierarchy which include non-answerable questions (i.e., testing absention);&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Make the benchmark fully parameterizable, so that it can be tailored to specific evaluation goals or grounded in empirical distributions obtained from real-world corpora.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>We thus test the agents along five separate axes of &lt;em>agentic causal data science&lt;/em>: symbolic causal reasoning, data science, uncertainty quantification, abstention, and tool use/coding.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We evaluate six contemporary agents — Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT-5.5, along with the open-weight Qwen 3.6 35B, Kimi K2.6, and Gemma 4 26B — on a 100-scene exam with realistically grounded composition. Claude Opus 4.8 leads overall, and the evaluated capabilities dissociate: symbolic causal reasoning is largely mastered across the field, while abstention, uncertainty quantification, and coding/tool-use/reasoning efficiency separate the models.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>New preprint: CausalDS</title><link>https://andleb.netlify.app/post/new-preprint-causalds/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://andleb.netlify.app/post/new-preprint-causalds/</guid><description>&lt;p>We recently submitted a new preprint titled &lt;a href="https://andleb.netlify.app/publication/causalds/">&lt;em>CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents&lt;/em>&lt;/a> to &lt;em>ArXiv&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>CausalDS is a benchmark &lt;em>generator&lt;/em> for causal reasoning in agentic data-science workflows: every benchmark instance is fully synthetically generated, and tests the agents along five separate axes of &lt;em>agentic causal data science&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Joint work with Yuekai Sun.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>